October 5, 2009
It's becoming more evident that something highly unusual has been and is currently happening in the skies above us. After decades of attempts to debunk reports of strange flying objects, the U.S. government must be feeling some pressure after the release of the French government's records on their UFO research.
We're also struck by the huge increase in media programs over the last year dealing with apocalyptic events and/or extraterrestrial visitors. Are we subtly being prepared for an event that would change humanity as we've known it?
There is something flying over the Earth, invading the airspace of world governments and even penetrating secure military installations. The reports of reliable pilots, astronauts, government officials, military officers/observers, police and the general public have left little doubt that there's something very advanced flying above us.
Whether it's extraterrestrial or Earth-made, governments have a real problem when it comes to actually disclosing the facts. Religious interests face similar problems if the answer is extraterrestrial, big oil may have egg on their face if the answer is found right here on Earth.
To explain the problem if the technology was produced here on Earth, let's say it is finally divulged that the craft we've been seeing was developed by the United States in the late 1940's - early 1950's time period. This craft is powered by technology that does not use fossil fuel and is non-polluting. Can you imagine the public outcry from such a disclosure? Environmentalists would be besides themselves, the average citizen would be outraged by the price they've been forced to pay for fuel, what about the "wars" that have been fought and the lives lost due to oil? That type of disclosure would certainly lead to huge displays of civil disobedience and can you imagine the additional outcry if it was disclosed that the technology came from Nazi Germany and Werner Von Braun? The fact that this power source had been kept from the public for 50+ years now makes releasing the information very problematic for governments, oil companies, etc.
Now let's assume the craft are from outside our planet. Governments must admit they can't defend our airspace and religious concerns have some real problems to deal with and believers may find it hard to continue following doctrines that may now have no basis.
So, why the secrecy? Nobody can decide how to handle the truth when the public finds out. It's going to be very interesting when the day arrives.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Monday, August 31, 2009
CONGRESS IGNORES HOMEOWNERS IN DISTRESS
August 31, 2009
As we've been reporting for some time now, Congress continues to turn a blind-eye to homeowners struggling to save their homes. It sure was/is easy for the elected representatives to "rescue" any industry that can benefit their own interests, but heaven forbid if you aren't ready to offer them a few thousand dollars for their coffers or hire their "educationally-challenged" offspring as your new CEO.
These "representatives" apparently still haven't gotten the message that people are mad and will not allow the current cast of characters to continue in the cushy jobs they were elected to perform. The rules of the game, as politicians have known them for a hundred years, have changed. People are aware of the corrupt characters representing them, mainly due to the efforts of independent bloggers - hello Mr. Rangel!
It's high time that Congress step in and demand that lenders seriously attempt to modify mortgages, especially those in imminent danger of foreclosure. The Administration can sure find things to spend money on and events to distract us. Any chance they can look at the perilous situation facing huge numbers of homeowners? That part of the economy apparently isn't sexy enough for them - so, maybe if we can make the issue more attractive or someone can offer a CEO spot to one of their mushrooms in return for some action, we could see something being done for homeowners.
As we've been reporting for some time now, Congress continues to turn a blind-eye to homeowners struggling to save their homes. It sure was/is easy for the elected representatives to "rescue" any industry that can benefit their own interests, but heaven forbid if you aren't ready to offer them a few thousand dollars for their coffers or hire their "educationally-challenged" offspring as your new CEO.
These "representatives" apparently still haven't gotten the message that people are mad and will not allow the current cast of characters to continue in the cushy jobs they were elected to perform. The rules of the game, as politicians have known them for a hundred years, have changed. People are aware of the corrupt characters representing them, mainly due to the efforts of independent bloggers - hello Mr. Rangel!
It's high time that Congress step in and demand that lenders seriously attempt to modify mortgages, especially those in imminent danger of foreclosure. The Administration can sure find things to spend money on and events to distract us. Any chance they can look at the perilous situation facing huge numbers of homeowners? That part of the economy apparently isn't sexy enough for them - so, maybe if we can make the issue more attractive or someone can offer a CEO spot to one of their mushrooms in return for some action, we could see something being done for homeowners.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
STRANGE PROFILE EMERGES FOR WASHINGTON APPOINTMENTS
August 25, 2009
We are seeing a very strange commonality in the background of persons being appointed to significant positions within the current Administration. This is even more important if you take President Obama seriously when he said, "If you want to know what I'm about, look at the people I surround myself with". Well, if we want to believe what the President is telling us (and this is what they want and deserve as the elected leader of the free world), we have to interpret his statement at face value. To do this raises very disturbing questions concerning exactly where this Administration intends to take America.
There appears to be more than a few radicals from the 1960's and union-types finding their way into influential positions within the Administration. A former co-founder of the '60's radical Weather Underground, Jeff Jones, is now head of the Apollo Alliance. The Weather Underground bombed government buildings in the '60's and Bill Ayers, another Obama "acquaintance" was a founding member of the group. According to House Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Apollo Alliance was instrumental in writing the Stimulus Package legislation. Mr. Jones now profits handsomely by advising companies on how to obtain money from the Stimulus Package.
This is only one of the Administration's ties to '60's radicals, including William Ayers, Van Jones, Rev. Wright, Carol Browner, Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, Ezekiel Emmanuel (brother of the Chief of Staff - surprising), plus a recent decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panthers for alleged polling place intimidation violations from the 2008 Presidential election.
In 1996, a number of these White House "acquaintances" even reconstituted the '60's radical groups like "Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)" and the Weather Underground into a new entity calling themselves "Movement for a Democratic Society (MDS)". It is not surprising that Mr. Jones, head of the Apollo Alliance, is on the Board of MDS.
Is anyone vetting these individuals? Or, taking Mr. Obama at his word, should we assume there's a message in these appointments and "acquaintences"? As we've said before, if there's not an agenda here, there have to be qualified individuals without this "baggage" that are willing to fill these positions. We are at a loss to explain why these professed radicals continue to be influencing our Country's future policy and ultimate destiny.
We are seeing a very strange commonality in the background of persons being appointed to significant positions within the current Administration. This is even more important if you take President Obama seriously when he said, "If you want to know what I'm about, look at the people I surround myself with". Well, if we want to believe what the President is telling us (and this is what they want and deserve as the elected leader of the free world), we have to interpret his statement at face value. To do this raises very disturbing questions concerning exactly where this Administration intends to take America.
There appears to be more than a few radicals from the 1960's and union-types finding their way into influential positions within the Administration. A former co-founder of the '60's radical Weather Underground, Jeff Jones, is now head of the Apollo Alliance. The Weather Underground bombed government buildings in the '60's and Bill Ayers, another Obama "acquaintance" was a founding member of the group. According to House Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Apollo Alliance was instrumental in writing the Stimulus Package legislation. Mr. Jones now profits handsomely by advising companies on how to obtain money from the Stimulus Package.
This is only one of the Administration's ties to '60's radicals, including William Ayers, Van Jones, Rev. Wright, Carol Browner, Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, Ezekiel Emmanuel (brother of the Chief of Staff - surprising), plus a recent decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panthers for alleged polling place intimidation violations from the 2008 Presidential election.
In 1996, a number of these White House "acquaintances" even reconstituted the '60's radical groups like "Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)" and the Weather Underground into a new entity calling themselves "Movement for a Democratic Society (MDS)". It is not surprising that Mr. Jones, head of the Apollo Alliance, is on the Board of MDS.
Is anyone vetting these individuals? Or, taking Mr. Obama at his word, should we assume there's a message in these appointments and "acquaintences"? As we've said before, if there's not an agenda here, there have to be qualified individuals without this "baggage" that are willing to fill these positions. We are at a loss to explain why these professed radicals continue to be influencing our Country's future policy and ultimate destiny.
Monday, August 24, 2009
ADVICE TO HOMEOWNERS IN FORECLOSURE
August 24, 2009
Many homeowners currently in foreclosure have tried unsuccessfully to have their loans modified. The vast majority of loan modification firms are either scams or simply ineffective, which leaves few options for the unfortunate homeowner.
If you've tried all options and still face a foreclosure sale AND you're interested in staying in your home, I highly recommend that you file bankruptcy. It's our understanding that either Chapter 7 or 13 will allow for the following action. At the time you file, indicate to your attorney that you are interested in requesting the "loan stripping" option. This allows the presiding judge to nullify your existing mortgage(s) (including home equity loans) and to re-value the property based on current market values. A new 30-year fixed-rate mortgage will be structured by the Court and you will be able to save your home.
You should only employ this option if you are interested in staying in your home and can afford to pay the new mortgage payment. You can even file an "emergency" bankruptcy within a few days of the sale and, in most cases, the scheduled sale will be cancelled.
We are simply interested in giving homeowners an option that gets little attention, but provides significant relief and, importantly, sticks it to the lenders. These crooks have gotten away with grand larceny, insurance fraud and investment fraud on a monumental scale and deserve all the consequences that can be unloaded on them.
Many homeowners currently in foreclosure have tried unsuccessfully to have their loans modified. The vast majority of loan modification firms are either scams or simply ineffective, which leaves few options for the unfortunate homeowner.
If you've tried all options and still face a foreclosure sale AND you're interested in staying in your home, I highly recommend that you file bankruptcy. It's our understanding that either Chapter 7 or 13 will allow for the following action. At the time you file, indicate to your attorney that you are interested in requesting the "loan stripping" option. This allows the presiding judge to nullify your existing mortgage(s) (including home equity loans) and to re-value the property based on current market values. A new 30-year fixed-rate mortgage will be structured by the Court and you will be able to save your home.
You should only employ this option if you are interested in staying in your home and can afford to pay the new mortgage payment. You can even file an "emergency" bankruptcy within a few days of the sale and, in most cases, the scheduled sale will be cancelled.
We are simply interested in giving homeowners an option that gets little attention, but provides significant relief and, importantly, sticks it to the lenders. These crooks have gotten away with grand larceny, insurance fraud and investment fraud on a monumental scale and deserve all the consequences that can be unloaded on them.
Friday, August 21, 2009
CAPPS MIA IN WASHINGTON
August 21, 2009
We get reports from people all the time and it's amazing how some government officials get more negative interest than others. One example is California Congresswoman Lois Capps. Ms. Capps (apologies to "Senator" Boxer) represents some pretty pricey areas in Southern California, but apparently has gone MIA during the recent economic crisis in Washington.
Her constituents have flooded her office with pleas for assistance only to be largely ignored by her and her staff. A Town Hall meeting is a far from happening as her sudden resignation from what she apparently sees as a career job. From what we're hearing, she may have a big surprise when she next appears on the ballot.
Constituents have been demanding that she do something about the huge numbers of homes going into foreclosure in her District. Guess she has her fingers into the profits being made from those robberies, otherwise you'd think she'd try to stop the lenders from stealing the homes in her District. Just another example of the weak representation we have in Washington. When things are good, they love the perks in return for breathing. But when they actually need to represent the interests of their constituents, they disappear and hope they can keep their cushy job by simply staying out of the press. Surprise! We advertised that we were going to name those who are failing the voters that put them in office, Lois Capps you are a disgrace.
We get reports from people all the time and it's amazing how some government officials get more negative interest than others. One example is California Congresswoman Lois Capps. Ms. Capps (apologies to "Senator" Boxer) represents some pretty pricey areas in Southern California, but apparently has gone MIA during the recent economic crisis in Washington.
Her constituents have flooded her office with pleas for assistance only to be largely ignored by her and her staff. A Town Hall meeting is a far from happening as her sudden resignation from what she apparently sees as a career job. From what we're hearing, she may have a big surprise when she next appears on the ballot.
Constituents have been demanding that she do something about the huge numbers of homes going into foreclosure in her District. Guess she has her fingers into the profits being made from those robberies, otherwise you'd think she'd try to stop the lenders from stealing the homes in her District. Just another example of the weak representation we have in Washington. When things are good, they love the perks in return for breathing. But when they actually need to represent the interests of their constituents, they disappear and hope they can keep their cushy job by simply staying out of the press. Surprise! We advertised that we were going to name those who are failing the voters that put them in office, Lois Capps you are a disgrace.
GREEN JOBS "ADVISOR" NAMED - MAINSTREAM MEDIA IGNORES APPOINTMENT
August 21, 2009
We've been waiting to see what kind of coverage Obama's appointment of Van Jones as the U.S. Green Jobs Special Advisor would get from the mainstream media. it was of interest because of Mr. Jones' previous affiliations and "social justice" beliefs. He admittedly has advocated for social unrest and describes himself as a "communist" and a "rowdy black nationalist".
Now, we've tried to be pragmatic when reporting on issues affecting the country, but it's difficult to understand why this appointment has been largely ignored. Considering the coverage Obama's relationship with Reverend Wright got from the press, it's strange that this fellow has flown under the radar.
Granted, Mr. Jones has advocated for increasing our focus on using green technology for a number of years and has published a book entitled "The Green Collar Economy". But, given the background and admitted beliefs of Mr. Jones, should he have been the primary choice to fill this position? What good does it do for the Administration to have a man described by NewsBusters as having "a very checkered past" deep-rooted in radical politics, including black nationalism, anarchism, and communism" guiding the Nation's green technology interests? There were no other candidates with equal or better qualifications and with less polarizing ideas to fill this position?
Again, putting aside politics and focusing simply on the best interests of the Country, why introduce such an admitted social radical into the top-levels of government? We need people in Washington that are concerned with doing the right thing, rather than radicals from either side pushing special-interest agendas. These type of appointments are disturbing, especially since they evade the normal "consent" process that Congress has over confirming Cabinet Secretaries.
Our charge is to give our readers the facts as we can best discern from information gather from numerous sources, especially when important stories are ignored by the mainstream media. Therefore, we will give you the background of Mr. Jones and let you decide whether he is the best choice.
We've already pointed out Mr. Jones advocacy for green technology and promoting the creation of jobs from increased use and his published book on green economy. An active advocate for a number of years. Now, let's look at his past. Jones is an admitted San Francisco extremist who says he was "radicalized in jail".
The National Review Online reports that Jones was a co-founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, a San Francisco–area organization once focused exclusively on so-called social-justice issues. Now, actively involved in the green movement.
In a 2007 entry on the Huffington Post, Jones marked the 15th anniversary of the riots that followed the acquittal of the four LAPD officers accused of beating Rodney King. Attached to the post is an essay he wrote in those heady days of 1992, which includes this account of the genesis of his revolutionary ardor:
"Our rallying cry was for justice; our demand was that the System be changed! Yes, the Great Revolutionary Moment had at long last come. And the time, clearly, was ours! So we stole stuff.Y’know, stole stuff. Radios, tennis shoes. Well, not everybody, of course.The vast majority (me included) just marched around and chanted slogans. But some set trash cans on fire. And smashed in car windows. And some kids stoned a few passing cars pretty good. And stole stuff, like I said."
So it's obvious that Mr. Jones at one time at least felt that he was part of "the Great Revolution" and they felt the need for "justice", which was demonstrated by stealing merchandise from neighborhood stores.
We just have to question Mr. Obama's choice, it seems too in-line with previous affiliations with Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, and Bill Ayers. Again, we do not need polarizing figures with radical agendas deciding policy for our Country.
We've been waiting to see what kind of coverage Obama's appointment of Van Jones as the U.S. Green Jobs Special Advisor would get from the mainstream media. it was of interest because of Mr. Jones' previous affiliations and "social justice" beliefs. He admittedly has advocated for social unrest and describes himself as a "communist" and a "rowdy black nationalist".
Now, we've tried to be pragmatic when reporting on issues affecting the country, but it's difficult to understand why this appointment has been largely ignored. Considering the coverage Obama's relationship with Reverend Wright got from the press, it's strange that this fellow has flown under the radar.
Granted, Mr. Jones has advocated for increasing our focus on using green technology for a number of years and has published a book entitled "The Green Collar Economy". But, given the background and admitted beliefs of Mr. Jones, should he have been the primary choice to fill this position? What good does it do for the Administration to have a man described by NewsBusters as having "a very checkered past" deep-rooted in radical politics, including black nationalism, anarchism, and communism" guiding the Nation's green technology interests? There were no other candidates with equal or better qualifications and with less polarizing ideas to fill this position?
Again, putting aside politics and focusing simply on the best interests of the Country, why introduce such an admitted social radical into the top-levels of government? We need people in Washington that are concerned with doing the right thing, rather than radicals from either side pushing special-interest agendas. These type of appointments are disturbing, especially since they evade the normal "consent" process that Congress has over confirming Cabinet Secretaries.
Our charge is to give our readers the facts as we can best discern from information gather from numerous sources, especially when important stories are ignored by the mainstream media. Therefore, we will give you the background of Mr. Jones and let you decide whether he is the best choice.
We've already pointed out Mr. Jones advocacy for green technology and promoting the creation of jobs from increased use and his published book on green economy. An active advocate for a number of years. Now, let's look at his past. Jones is an admitted San Francisco extremist who says he was "radicalized in jail".
The National Review Online reports that Jones was a co-founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, a San Francisco–area organization once focused exclusively on so-called social-justice issues. Now, actively involved in the green movement.
In a 2007 entry on the Huffington Post, Jones marked the 15th anniversary of the riots that followed the acquittal of the four LAPD officers accused of beating Rodney King. Attached to the post is an essay he wrote in those heady days of 1992, which includes this account of the genesis of his revolutionary ardor:
"Our rallying cry was for justice; our demand was that the System be changed! Yes, the Great Revolutionary Moment had at long last come. And the time, clearly, was ours! So we stole stuff.Y’know, stole stuff. Radios, tennis shoes. Well, not everybody, of course.The vast majority (me included) just marched around and chanted slogans. But some set trash cans on fire. And smashed in car windows. And some kids stoned a few passing cars pretty good. And stole stuff, like I said."
So it's obvious that Mr. Jones at one time at least felt that he was part of "the Great Revolution" and they felt the need for "justice", which was demonstrated by stealing merchandise from neighborhood stores.
We just have to question Mr. Obama's choice, it seems too in-line with previous affiliations with Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, and Bill Ayers. Again, we do not need polarizing figures with radical agendas deciding policy for our Country.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
MORTGAGE SERVICERS, BANKS THUMB THEIR NOSES AT CONGRESS
August 11, 2009
There seems to be some type of collusion occurring between so-called "mortgage servicers", banks and Congress. Although significant legislation has been passed requiring lien holders to contact homeowners and attempt to modify their loans, these companies seem impervious to legal requirements and their consequences for noncompliance.
One of the worst offenders in the "mortgage servicer" category is Saxon Mortgage. Not only is this company an apparent "black hole" when it comes to providing information, they are well known by most legal firms dealing with foreclosures, being described by one attorney as "one of, if not the worst of the bunch".
How is it that these shills for "investors" can circumvent legal requirements and continue to profit at the expense of our economy for the sole purpose of sucking out further ill-gotten gains? Politicians who sat by and allowed this rape of homeowners to proceed will not be forgotten when the next election rolls around. When hundreds of thousands of people's net worth is basically wiped out to further line the pockets of politicians and criminals posing as mortgage bankers there will be consequences.
There seems to be some type of collusion occurring between so-called "mortgage servicers", banks and Congress. Although significant legislation has been passed requiring lien holders to contact homeowners and attempt to modify their loans, these companies seem impervious to legal requirements and their consequences for noncompliance.
One of the worst offenders in the "mortgage servicer" category is Saxon Mortgage. Not only is this company an apparent "black hole" when it comes to providing information, they are well known by most legal firms dealing with foreclosures, being described by one attorney as "one of, if not the worst of the bunch".
How is it that these shills for "investors" can circumvent legal requirements and continue to profit at the expense of our economy for the sole purpose of sucking out further ill-gotten gains? Politicians who sat by and allowed this rape of homeowners to proceed will not be forgotten when the next election rolls around. When hundreds of thousands of people's net worth is basically wiped out to further line the pockets of politicians and criminals posing as mortgage bankers there will be consequences.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)